Naacemark for Service Providers 2.0
Naace has completely revised its quality assurance scheme for service providers to make it consistent with established principles of self-review. Details of this new '2.0' scheme may be found here.
Making a submissionOrganisations may make use of the Naacemark structure at any time to review their service delivery. It is designed as a series of self-review prompts, rather than a set of strictly defined criteria, to be used as both a developmental tool and as the basis for a structured assessment. Although we refer to a 'submission' in this article, we strongly encourage service providers to undertake a review, even if they have no immediate intention of seeking accreditation.NMSP: Overview and guidanceThe 'Overview and guidance' document, available for download here, explains how a submission consists of a structured commentary; organisations seeking accreditation are not required to produce a detailed portfolio of evidence. There are three broad areas for the self-review process:
Service Area prompts and Review documentationNMSP: Service Area promptsTo assist the process, a list of prompts and suggested evidence are given, although these are neither binding nor exhaustive. These prompts do not appear in the 'Review form', since our intention is that service providers use the structure to describe their own QA system in the way that is most suited to their context.There are four broad areas of service defined in the scheme:
One of the first sections in the 'Review form' is the Context statement. This provides an opportunity to explain how the organisation works: its aims, the services it provides, the constraints it works within and how the particular service area(s) chosen apply to its business or responsibilities. It is intended to be a fairly brief description. If you decide to submit for assessment in a specific service area, you must complete a 'Review Form' (or create a suitable equivalent). The content of this form is your commentary, showing how the service you offer meets the requirements of the scheme for a given service area. ![]() Naacemarked Services
Curriculum Planning
Resources
Standards and Inspections
Public
Naace member
Submitted by: Neil Adam
Publication date: 04th March 2008 Withdrawal date: --- Created: 20th February 2008 Last updated: 04th March 2008 15:28 Persistent link to this article:http://www.naace.org/624 |
Featured articleQCA consultation on revised assessment criteria for GCSE ICTQCA has published proposed assessment criteria and regulations for controlled assessment for the revised GCSE in ICT, for first teaching in 2010. You can contribute to Naace's response to QCA by visiting the wiki in Naace Knowledge and adding your comments to the questions there. Featured articleRose Review of the Primary CurriculumSir Jim Rose is leading an independent review of the primary curriculum. His initial focus was Curriculum Design and Content, including a key issue for Naace members: What should be the position of ICT within the primary curriculum? Here is Naace's response. Featured articleNaace response to DCSF consultation on Home AccessNaace Members have contributed to the DCSF consultation on the proposed Home Access programme. The DCSF sought views on a number of questions during Spring 2008 and the Naace response is published here. Featured articleParliamentary Committee Inquiry into the National Curriculum: 2008In February 2008, Parliament announced its intention to undertake an Inquiry into the National Curriculum and invited submissions of written evidence. Featured articleNaacemark for Service Providers 2.0Naace has completely revised its quality assurance scheme for service providers to make it consistent with established principles of self-review. Details of this new '2.0' scheme may be found here. |